Literature on appraising qualitative research

  • Munthe-Kaas HM, Booth A, Sommer I, et al. Developing CAMELOT for assessing methodological limitations of qualitative research for inclusion in qualitative evidence syntheses. Cochrane Ev Synth. 2024; 2:e12058. doi:10.1002/cesm.12058. FULL TEXT
  • Munthe-Kaas HM, Glenton C, Booth A, Noyes J, Lewin S. Systematic mapping of existing tools to appraise methodological strengths and limitations of qualitative research: first stage in the development of the CAMELOT tool. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2019 Jun 4;19(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0728-6. FULL TEXT
  • Santiago-Delefosse, M., Gavin, A., Bruchez, C., Stephen, S.L., & Roux, P. (01/2016). Quality of Qualitative Research in the Health Sciences: Analysis of the Common Criteria Present in 58 Assessment Guidelines by Expert Users. Soc Sci Med. 2016 Jan;148:142-51. ABSTRACT
  • Garside, R. Should we appraise the quality of qualitative research reports for systematic reviews, and if so, how? Innovations: The European journal of social science research 2014; 27 (1):67 - 79. FULL TEXT
  • Bowen, G.A.(2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note. Qualitative Research, 2008, 8,137. ABSTRACT
  • Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042. Epub 2007 Sep 14. PMID: 17872937. FULL TEXT
  • Walsh D, Downe S. Appraising the quality of qualitative research. Midwifery. 2006; 22(2):108-19. FULL TEXT
  • Dixon-Woods, M., Shaw, R.L., Smith, J.A. The problem of appraising qualitative research. BMJ Quality & Safety, 2004, 13,223-225. FULL TEXT